Comment on page
Figure 7: Feedback Controller
Suppose we choose to control the plant by scaling our error signal by
and then put the controller on the feedback path like in Figure 7. It would be helpful for us to understand how the closed loop poles of the feedback system change as
is varied over the range
. First, suppose
Then the transfer function of the overall system is
The closed loop poles are the roots of the denominator polynomial (called the characteristic polynomial).
Clearly, no matter what
is, the poles must satisfy two criteria.
All points on the root locus must satisfy Equation 15.
First, notice that the roots of
are the closed loop poles of the system.
Next, because we are dealing with real systems, complex poles must have a corresponding conjugate pole.
Going back to Equation 15, we can alternatively express the angle criteria as
are open loop zeros and
are open loop poles. If we restrict ourselves to the real axis, then given a closed loop pole
is small, then the poles look like the open loop poles. As
grows very large, then the poles look like the open loop zeros.
If there are more poles (
) then zeros (
), then not all of the poles will end up at a zero in the limit. This means that
poles must branch off to infinity.
If there is a gap between real-axis segments, in order to end at an open loop zero, poles must sometimes break away from the real axis and then re-enter.
Since the angles can travel asymptotically, they sometimes cross the imaginary axis.
Similarly, if the poles begin at complex locations, then we can find their angle of departure.
, we can determine
if we know a particular pole location.
Because the Root Locus rules are derived from the characteristic polynomial
of the closed-loop system, they can be used not just to find how the closed loop poles vary with a gain, but also to find how the closed loop poles vary with an open loop pole. Suppose that
Thus if we apply the root locus rules to the open loop system
then we can capture the behavior of the closed loop poles of the original system as we vary the location of the open loop pole we control.
If we write the frequency response in polar form,
is the magnitude of a factor
is either a zero or a pole,
are the phases of each factor, and
are the number of zeros and poles at 0. By writing
this way, it is clear that
If we take the convert this to decibels, we get
Likewise, the exponential form of
tells us that
are of the form
. Likewise, if
. This means we can approximate bode plots using piece-wise linear segments using the following rules.
- 1.Each zerocontributesto magnitude starting at.
- 2.Each polecontributesto magnitude starting at.
- 3.Each zerocontributesto phase starting atand ending at.
- 4.Each polecontributesto phase starting atand ending at.
One useful way to use bode plots is to approximate the gain and phase margin because they can easily be seen visually from the plots themselves.
Figure 8: Feedback Controller
Consider the basic feedback system in Figure 8 and suppose that
Then the feedback transfer function is
If we focus specifically on the poles of the system, then we see
From here, we can see that the poles of
are the poles of the open loop system whereas the zeros of
are the poles of the closed loop system.
Thus, given an open loop transfer function
, we can determine its stability. We already know
from the poles of the open loop system, and we can find
by defining a contour which encapsulates the right half plane and use Equation 16 to find
. However, remember that we need to find the RHP poles of
. This shifts our mapping to the right by
, so we can instead just let
be the number of encirclements of
. Once we have
, we know how many RHP poles the closed loop transfer function will have because they are the same as the RHP zeros of the
. We can extend the Nyquist Criterion to finding a range of gains that would make the open-loop system
stable by looking for the encirclements of
The contour which is easiest to find the mapping for is the one which starts at the origin, travels up the imaginary axis, encapsulates the right half plane, and then travels back up the imaginary axis back to the origin in a counter-clockwise fasion. This is the easiest because while the contour is on the imaginary axis, the mapping is just the frequency response of the system, and we can use the Bode plot of the system in order to draw the contour because each point on the mapping is a complex vector, and the bode plot can give us both the magnitude and angle of that vector.